http://www.thnt.com/apps/pbcs.dll/section?category=COLUMNISTS25
The Quran is very clear about the human family that we all come from Adam and Eve. God created us to know one another. Our differences in language, color, ethnicity and culture are a sign from God so that we would connect with each other, not harbor suspicion and hatred for one another.
“If God had willed, He would have made you one community but things are as they are to test you in what He has given you. So compete with each other in good.” 5:48
In addition, God mentions that He would have made us into a monolithic community, but it is a test and part of His grand plan to observe our actions.
“If God did not enable some men to keep back others, hermitages, synagogues, chapels and mosques where the name of God is mentioned would have been demolished.” 22:40
Muslims believe that many religious teachings of the earlier prophets were preserved by various religions. As long as the source of the teaching is God, harmony and justice will exist in these teachings.
As God commands the believers to say, “We believe in what has been revealed to us and what has been revealed to you; our God and your God is the One.’ 29:46
One may ask, why is there a need for an interfaith dialogue?
If we are on the truth, why spend time learning other than the truth? Should we not protect our faith by isolating ourselves from other ideas?
Let us look into the lives of People of God for guidance. Indeed, Prophet Muhammad welcomed dialogue and he welcomed the Christians of Najran and allowed them to stay and pray in the mosque of Medina. He never compelled people to become Muslim.
God commands the believers in the Quran, “There is no compulsion in religion.” Islam requires that one becomes a believer by his/her volition.
Religion is a matter of conviction of the heart and mind. It is a commitment to do good work based on shared values to uplift human experiences. In essence, we have an obligation to humanity based on our conviction in God.
Unfortunately, some people have the perception that religions teach prejudice, intolerance, division, and as a proof, they mention all the wars and crimes committed in the name of religion and/or God. Here I would like to point out that no war is holy. No crime committed by a religious or nonreligious person is above the justice of God. Foul behavior has no religion, no scripture, no temple, and no prophets. They are charlatans, wolves in sheep’s clothing.
Any crime committed in the name of God or freedom does not exonerate any individual from their evil action. Prophet Muhammad said, “God does not look at your faces and physical bodies but rather he looks at your hearts and actions.” For this reason, Believers should come forward with an exemplary behavior.
It certainly takes courage and a deep conviction in one’s own way of life to reach out to others. It also clarifies various religious positions. For example, a Muslim or a member of any religious community who makes the news doing evil actions does not represent his/her religion. Yet, people may confuse an individuals’ misbehavior to represent the entire religious teachings. Hence, a dialogue is crucial to better understand and appreciate people of other faiths.
My first encounter with an interfaith discussion was about five years ago with Paul Heck, a professor at Georgetown University. In his talk, he casually asserted that many religious people claim to possess the whole truth. He then followed by stating that we need to be humble before making such vociferous claims. His words left me a bit confused. How could I be “humble” when I believe that as a Muslim I possess the truth?
God tells us that “Those who strive for our sake, we shall guide them to our paths. Surely, God is with those who do good.” There are many paths to God. Those who accompanied Abraham went on his path to God. Those who followed Moses took on His path. Those who loved and became disciples of Jesus took His way. And those who follow Muhammad are on the path to God.
God is the truth (al-Haq) and calls us to become people of truth. To quote Greg Mast, president of the New Brunswick Theological Seminary, “We don’t possess the truth but the truth possesses us.”
Dialogue is what brings us closer, as in the words of Rabbi Reed of Rutgers Hillel, “How good it is when brothers (referring to the children of Ishmael and Isaac) come together.”
In this time when people are vilifying and demonizing theother, it is urgent to have a dialogue to rid ourselves of stereotypes and misinformation. Unless we commit to an active dialogue, suspicion will fill the void. Rev. John Larson mentioned in an interfaith discussion after the tragic event of Sept. 11, 2001, that a local imam said it was the responsibility of Muslims to reach out and to educate their non-Muslim friends, neighbors and coworkers about Islam. The result of such neglect is that Islamophobia is on a rise. Regrettably, latest surveys show that many Americans believe that Islam endorses violence and hatred.
In conclusion, what kind of world would we like to leave behind for our children? A place full of suspicion, insult, prejudice, hate or a place full of love, understanding, compassion, justice? Let us work together and let our actions speak louder than our words. For surely, we are in shortage of people who can contribute to peace, love and understanding. As Jesus Christ mentioned, “Blessed are the peacemakers.”
Be peacemakers, contributors and callers to God. Let us pray and recognize the bonds that unite us and let not our differences divide us. Amen.
Another intersting perspective on Islam by the former vice chairman of the National Intelligence Council at the CIA. This piece is very different from much of what I read and hear in the media. You be the judge. (You can grab a copy of the article from your local library).
A World without Islam – by Graham Fuller, former vicechairman of the National Intelligence Council at the CIA. FOREIGN POLICY Jan-Feb 2008 http://www.foreignpolicy.com/users/login.phpstory_id=4094&URL=http://www.foreignpolicy.com/story/cms.php?story_id=4094
“…In the West’s focus on terrorism in the name of Islam, memories are short. Jewish guerrillas used terrorism against the British in Palestine. Sri Lankan Hindu Tamil “Tigers” invented the art of the suicide vest and for more than a decade led the world in the use of suicide bombings–including the assassination of Indian Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi. Greek terrorists carried out assassination operations against U.S. officials in Athens. Organized Sikh terrorism killed Indira Gandhi, spread havoc in India, established an overseas base in Canada, and brought down an Air India flight over the Atlantic. Macedonian terrorists were widely feared all across the Balkans on the eve of World War I.
Dozens of major assassinations in thelate 19th and early 20th centuries were carried out by European and American”anarchists,” sowing collective fear. The Irish Republican Army employed brutally effective terrorism against the British for decades, as did communist guerrillas and terrorists in Vietnam against Americans, communistMalayans against British soldiers in the 1950s, Mau-Mau terrorists against British officers in Kenya–the list goes on. It doesn’t take a Muslim tocommit terrorism.
Even the recent history of terrorist activity doesn’t look much different. According to Europol, 498 terrorist attacks took place in the European Union in 2006. Of these, 424 were perpetrated by separatist groups, 55 byleft-wing extremists, and 18 by various other terrorists. Only 1 was carriedout by Islamists.
To be sure, there were a number of foiled attempts in ahighly surveilled Muslim community. But these figures reveal the broadideological range of potential terrorists in the world…
…Remember too, that virtually every one of the principle horrors of the 20thcentury came almost exclusively from strictly secular regimes: Leopold II ofBelgium in the Congo, Hitler, Mussolini, Lenin and Stalin, Mao, and Pol Pot. It was Europeans who visited their “world wars” twice upon the rest of the world” two devastating global conflicts with no remote parallels in Islamichistory.
Some today might wish for a “world without Islam” in which these problems presumably had never come to be. But, in truth, the conflicts, rivalries, and crises of such a world might not look so vastly different than the ones we know today.”
Picture: Ex-musician Napoleon (Mutah Beale), center, talks to young Muslim men about the dangers of the gangsta life.
Below is a great essay from a great mind, Mr. Tariq Ramadan. It is a good introduction for both Muslims and Non-Muslims about the Quran. We need more of these writings from Muslim leaders and intellectuals to educate the masses in the Western society about Islam. There are few Islamic scholars who choose to communicate through mainstream media. Many simply like to remain anonymous. Some only speak to the Muslim audience. They are at a loss when asked to present Islam to non-muslims. They live with a ghetto mentality issuing FATWAS on Hollywood and Bollywood but never offering an alternative or guidance to the problem.
I must say living in isolation is very comfortable especially, when there is no one to question. There is no one to argue. There is no one to reject and ridicule. There is no one to challenge the dwindling faith and a hidden inferiority complex.
But the Prophet peace be on him did not live in isolation from his community. This is something for religious Muslims to think about…
Reading the Koran
By TARIQ RAMADAN
Published: January 6, 2008
NY Times
For Muslims the Koran stands as the Text of reference, the source and the essence of the message transmitted to humanity by the creator. It is the last of a lengthy series of revelations addressed to humans down through history. It is the Word of God — but it is not God. The Koran makes known, reveals and guides: it is a light that responds to the quest for meaning. The Koran is remembrance of all previous messages, those of Noah and Abraham, of Moses and Jesus. Like them, it reminds and instructs our consciousness: life has meaning, facts are signs.
It is the Book of all Muslims the world over. But paradoxically, it is not the first book someone seeking to know Islam should read. (A life of the Prophet or any book presenting Islam would be a better introduction.) For it is both extremely simple and deeply complex. The nature of the spiritual, human, historical and social teachings to be drawn from it can be understood at different levels. The Text is one, but its readings are multiple. (continue…)
Unity & Brotherhood (((audio)))
based on Quran & Sunnah
Masjid Saffat, Oxford St.
Khutba Trenton, New Jersey
We have to unite the Ummah on the way of our beloved Prophet Muhammad. He united the Muhajirin and the Ansar by building a community that was united under the Quran and the sunnah of Our Prophet. They were one brotherhood under God. It was a unity of hearts with diversity of opinions, races, colors, genders, languages, etc.
Let us remember that unity is an injunction in the Quran and not a prescribed position. We need to sacrifice our opinions for the sake of unity. We need to prefer others over ourselves and petty opinions and arguments. Unity is only achieved with sacrifice. We must recognize the diversity of this ummah and strive to achieve harmony and not discord.
Peace,
Faraz Khan
Warning: please do not read the following if you have a weak heart.
There were microphone love stories. The dome infatuations. The Kursi (chair) trouble. Sometimes people were on kursi and other times the kursi was on them. The Phatwas that made people laugh and sigh. The moon-walking and the moon-fighting. And there were parties … yes, many parties to keep one busy. No, not the type where you sing and dance. Istaghfirullah! And certainly not the type of parties where you eat, drink and enjoy yourself. There were many parties on mosque election day. All promising us many promises.